Results

Home / Results

Results-Based

Our legal team is about results!!! We only take on a select number of clients in order to assure that we are able to give each client personalized attention in order to increase their chances for success.

We have a high rate of success; we know what the Parole Board is looking for and thus we demand a lot of our clients. We are not interested in taking on a lot of clients to make a lot of money; with that being said effective representation is not cheap, however, we are reasonably priced, we are dedicated to achieving our clients ultimate goal of having parole granted.

Hiring an experienced parole attorney is the most important decision that you will make in life if your goal is to parole. Our brand of service assures that each client is given quality representation and assure that the client fully understands what is expected and required to have PAROLE GRANTED.

If you are ready to parole and are willing to submit to our Navy Seal Boot Camp (BUD/S) of preparation for your parole hearing then we will consider accepting you as a client. Our rate of success is very high and we intend to keep that way!!!

Disclosure :

Specific information regarding clients and client matters not readily available to the public are considered by the firm to be included within the attorney-client confidential relationship. California – requires an express disclaimer that “this testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter” Rule 1-400, Standard (2) 

In keeping with the confidentiality of client matters, the following general descriptions provide a small sample of some of the RESULTS that the firm has achieved on behalf of clients:

  • On January 18, 20xx, Jenz L. was granted parole under Penal Code section 3040, the Governor declined to take further action.

  • On April 4, 20xx, Robert T. was granted parole as a Youthful offender and was found eligible for immediate release, qualifying with his MEPD and YPED date, the MEPD came first and qualified him for immediate release.

  • On August 24, 20xx, Mr. Michael C. was granted parole by the Board of Parole under Penal Code section 3040, et seq. after being denied parole numerous times.

  • On December 1, 20xxx the Board of Parole held a parole reconsideration hearing for Enrique O. after he was denied parole, Enrique was determined to be immediately eligible for parole.

  • On April 3, 20xx, Charles W. was granted parole after being denied numerous times as a Youthful Offender, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole.

  • On February 28, 20xx Rudolph M. was granted parole under Penal Code section 3040, et.seq. after being denied parole several times as a Youthful Offender.

  • On February 2, 20xx Leadre J. was granted parole after being denied parole for decades.

  • On December 5, 20xx James N. was granted parole subject to reaching his minimum eligibility date (MEPD).

  • On March 15, 20xx Darren J. was granted parole by the Board, the Governor took no further action and Darren was found eligible for immediate release.

  • On March 14, 20xx Steven C. was granted parole after being denied parole numerous times, the Governor took no further action and he was immediately found eligible for release.

  • On January 23, 20xx Roy R. was granted parole, it was further determined that he met his MEPD date and was immediately eligible for parole.

  • On January 25, 20xx Gary R. was granted parole using the Elderly Parole criteria as ordered by the Three Judge Court in Coleman/Plata v. Brown, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole.
    Gary R. had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On December 29, 20xx Gene C. was granted parole using the Elderly Parole criteria as ordered by the Three Judge Court in Coleman/Plata v. Brown, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole. Gene C. had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On December 28, 20xxx Thomas M. was granted parole using the Elderly Parole criteria as ordered by the Three Judge Court in Coleman/Plata v. Brown, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole. Thomas M. had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On December 27, 20xx Willie C. was granted parole using the Elderly Parole criteria as ordered by the Three Judge Court in Coleman/Plata v. Brown, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole. Willie C. had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On December 7, 20xx Ralph M. was granted parole using the Youthful Offender criteria, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole.

  • On November 2, 20xx Juan T. was granted parole and was determined to be eligible for immediate release. Juan had no special criteria applied for his hearing, he had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On October 3, 20xx Ryan R. was granted parole qualifying as a Youthful Offender having previously been denied parole for decades.

  • October 3, 20xx Victor S. was granted parole by the Board of Parole and was eligible as a qualified Youthful Offender.

  • On August 3, 20xx Robin G. was granted parole qualifying under the Youthful Offender criteria of Penal Code section 3051 and the Elderly Parole criteria as ordered by the Three Judge Court in Coleman/Plata v. Brown, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole. Robin G. had previously been denied parole for decades.

  • On September 20, 20xx, John H. was granted parole using the Youthful Offender criteria, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole.

  • On September 8, 20xx Wendell S. was granted parole using the Youthful Offender criteria, the Governor took no further action and he was found immediately eligible for parole.

  • On October 4, 20xx Antonio was granted parole and was determined to be eligible for immediate release. Antonio had no special criteria applied, he had previously been denied parole for decade(s).

For Effective Legal Representation
Call Us Now

Contact Form